Collecting opinions about blogging for me is as the same as collecting opinions about breathing air. The point being it's irrelevant.
BUT - when defining blogosphere, i will not be inventive, but just refer to Google, which says the following...
My personal thoughts about blogosphere is that there's is nothing new under the sun. Blogosphere to me is just a local community being digitalized. The thoughts, opinions and their face-offs on the blogs are the digital representations of the on-goings twenty years ago, when our fathers re(rather pre-)lived the same things, only the necessity was to meet in a tree-house, bar-room or some other constructive settlement.
Is it a good thing? That this get-togethering of families, friends or course-mates (!!!) is being converted from material/real-life to digital platforms? I think it is. Because for me personally - the people I meet in here (intronm09) through our common blogs (to avoid the repetitive use of blogosphere) I would never ever meet in other circumstances. And of course the growing role of information-sharing of there kinds of social web applications only raises the satisfaction about the possibilities available to me. "I can get to know you (name, age, sex) and GET to know you (thoughts, opinions, notions about our confluences)."
But I will never ever exclude the need to do some traditional tree-house/bar-room meetings as well. Even with you, the people whom I know only as "web-based". Because a human being is a slave to habit. And I am only human.
So, you are like slave of drinking beer in real bars with real persons (not the web-based ones)?
ReplyDeleteBut yes, I think as you but also I think that although there's nothing new under the sun, we must make acquaintance with the new appearance. And know how to act. In blogosphere, too.